(rfc2231-parse-string): Restore whitespace syntax for

?* and ?\; (tiny patch).  From Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>.

diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog
index 23459c6..ff64a2d 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2004-08-30  Simon Josefsson  <jas@extundo.com>
+
+       * rfc2231.el (rfc2231-parse-string): Restore whitespace syntax for
+       ?* and ?\; (tiny patch).  From Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>.
+
 2004-08-30  Simon Josefsson  <jas@extundo.com>
 
        * ietf-drums.el (ietf-drums-syntax-table): Set syntax of ?* ?\;

diff --git a/lisp/rfc2231.el b/lisp/rfc2231.el
index cf4428a..b08fe21 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/rfc2231.el
+++ b/lisp/rfc2231.el
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 ;;; rfc2231.el --- Functions for decoding rfc2231 headers
 
-;; Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+;; Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004
+;;        Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
 ;; Author: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
 ;; This file is part of GNU Emacs.
@@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ The list will be on the form
                        (mail-header-remove-comments string)))
       (let ((table (copy-syntax-table ietf-drums-syntax-table)))
        (modify-syntax-entry ?\' "w" table)
+       (modify-syntax-entry ?* " " table)
+       (modify-syntax-entry ?\; " " table)
        (modify-syntax-entry ?= " " table)
        ;; The following isn't valid, but one should be liberal
        ;; in what one receives.