Minor quoting etc. fixes to misc manuals

[gnus] / texi / gnus-faq.texi

diff --git a/texi/gnus-faq.texi b/texi/gnus-faq.texi
index 83fff5e..8126827 100644 (file)
--- a/texi/gnus-faq.texi
+++ b/texi/gnus-faq.texi
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 @c \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
 @c Uncomment 1st line before texing this file alone.
 @c %**start of header
-@c Copyright (C) 1995, 2001-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+@c Copyright (C) 1995, 2001-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 @c
 @c @setfilename gnus-faq.info
 @c @settitle Frequently Asked Questions
@@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ resulting in:
 :O  \->  ...                                      | 115 |Raymond Scholz       | 1:24
 :O    \->  ...                                    |  19 |Lars Magne Ingebrigt |15:33
 :O     Slow mailing list                          |  13 |Lars Magne Ingebrigt |Sat 23:49
-:O     Re: `@@' mark not documented                |  13 |Lars Magne Ingebrigt |Sat 23:50
+:O     Re: '@@' mark not documented                |  13 |Lars Magne Ingebrigt |Sat 23:50
 :R  >  Re: Gnus still doesn't count messages prope|  23 |Lars Magne Ingebrigt |Sat 23:57
 :O  \->  ...                                      |  18 |Kai Grossjohann      | 0:35
 :O    \->  ...                                    |  13 |Lars Magne Ingebrigt | 0:56
@@ -1501,7 +1501,7 @@ entries. Say @samp{c} to create a new
 entry, @samp{b} to search your BBDB and
 @samp{C-o} to add a new field to an
 entry. If you want to add a sender to the BBDB you can
-also just hit `:' on the posting in the summary buffer and
+also just hit @kbd{:} on the posting in the summary buffer and
 you are done. When you now compose a new mail,
 hit @samp{TAB} to cycle through know
 recipients.
@@ -1649,7 +1649,7 @@ aren't they and how to fix it?
 
 @subsubheading Answer
 
-The message-ID is an unique identifier for messages you
+The message-ID is a unique identifier for messages you
 send. To make it unique, Gnus need to know which machine
 name to put after the "@@". If the name of the machine
 where Gnus is running isn't suitable (it probably isn't