Fix minor quoting problems in doc strings

[gnus] / lisp / deuglify.el

diff --git a/lisp/deuglify.el b/lisp/deuglify.el
index 331b99b..df54f74 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/deuglify.el
+++ b/lisp/deuglify.el
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
 ;; > Bye, John
 ;;
 ;; Repairing the attribution line will be done by function
-;; `gnus-article-outlook-repair-attribution which calls other function that
+;; `gnus-article-outlook-repair-attribution' which calls other function that
 ;; try to recognize and repair broken attribution lines.  See variable
 ;; `gnus-outlook-deuglify-attrib-cut-regexp' for stuff that should be
 ;; cut off from the beginning of an attribution line and variable
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
 ;; Rearranging the article so that the cited text appears above the
 ;; new text will be done by function
 ;; `gnus-article-outlook-rearrange-citation'.  This function calls
-;; `gnus-article-outlook-repair-attribution to find and repair an attribution
+;; `gnus-article-outlook-repair-attribution' to find and repair an attribution
 ;; line.
 ;;
 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
@@ -177,14 +177,14 @@
 ;; As I said before there may (or will) be a few false positives on
 ;; unwrapping cited lines with `gnus-article-outlook-unwrap-lines'.
 ;;
-;; `gnus-article-outlook-repair-attribution will only fix the first
+;; `gnus-article-outlook-repair-attribution' will only fix the first
 ;; attribution line found in the article.  Furthermore it fixed to
 ;; certain kinds of attributions.  And there may be horribly many
 ;; false positives, vanishing lines and so on -- so don't trust your
 ;; eyes.  Again I recommend manual invocation.
 ;;
 ;; `gnus-article-outlook-rearrange-citation' carries all the limitations of
-;; `gnus-article-outlook-repair-attribution.
+;; `gnus-article-outlook-repair-attribution'.
 ;;
 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
 ;;